Fusion Markets vs Pepperstone
Two brokers, one table. Everything below is taken from what each one publishes on its own site, last read on 2026-09-02. No scores, no ranking.
An Australian broker with a Zero account and a Classic account.
Australian broker with strong platform choice and tight pricing.
| Detail | Fusion Markets | Pepperstone |
|---|---|---|
| Regulation | ASIC AFSL 385620 (Australian clients) · VFSC Vanuatu, company 40256 · FSA Seychelles SD096 | FCA, ASIC, CySEC and others by entity — confirm which applies to you |
| Minimum Deposit | — | No fixed minimum |
| Max Leverage | — | Varies by entity |
| Spread From | — | From 0.0 pips on Razor |
| Commission | — | From $3.5 per lot per side |
| Platforms | MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView | MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView |
| Account Types | Zero, Classic | Standard, Razor |
| Funding Methods | — | Card, Bank transfer, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller |
| Withdrawal Time | — | 1-3 business days |
| Founded | — | 2010 |
| Countries | — | 170+ |
What the figures say
- Pepperstone publishes its minimum deposit (No fixed minimum); Fusion Markets does not state one on the pages we read.
- Pepperstone publishes its max leverage (Varies by entity); Fusion Markets does not state one on the pages we read.
- Pepperstone publishes its spread from (From 0.0 pips on Razor); Fusion Markets does not state one on the pages we read.
- Pepperstone publishes its commission (From $3.5 per lot per side); Fusion Markets does not state one on the pages we read.
- Both list the same platforms: MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView.
- Account Types: Fusion Markets lists Zero, Classic; Pepperstone lists Standard, Razor.
- Pepperstone publishes its funding methods (Card, Bank transfer, PayPal, Skrill, Neteller); Fusion Markets does not state one on the pages we read.
- Pepperstone publishes its withdrawal time (1-3 business days); Fusion Markets does not state one on the pages we read.
- Fusion Markets also lists Metals, Energy.
A figure marked “—” is one that broker does not publish on the pages we could read; it is not a zero. Terms differ by country and change often, so confirm on each site before opening an account.
Fusion Markets: why traders choose it
- Three regulated entities, with ASIC covering Australian clients
- Copy trading through DupliTrade and Fusion+
- Multi Account Manager and sponsored VPS for algorithmic traders
Pepperstone: why traders choose it
- TradingView integration for charting and execution in one place
- Razor account offers spreads from 0.0 pips
- No fixed minimum deposit
- Strong regulatory coverage across several regions
- Well regarded customer support
Fusion Markets pros
- ASIC licence named in full on their own site
- cTrader and TradingView alongside both MetaTrader versions
Fusion Markets cons
- Not available to residents of a long list of countries, including the US, Japan and New Zealand
- Spreads and minimum deposit are not stated on the pages reachable from their footer
Pepperstone pros
- TradingView trading built in
- Tight Razor spreads
- Broad regulatory footprint
- No minimum deposit requirement
Pepperstone cons
- Commission applies on the tightest account
- Standard account pricing is average
- Instrument list is smaller than some rivals
- Crypto availability depends on region
About Pepperstone
Pepperstone pairs competitive ECN pricing with the widest platform choice of the major brokers, including TradingView.
More comparisons
How this page is put together. Both columns use the same fields as the individual reviews, read from each broker's own site. Some links are affiliate links, which may earn Cubie FX a commission at no extra cost to you. Placement is not for sale and nothing here is ranked.